STANDAR PROSEDURAL DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN PENYADAPAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan; Sarwo Waskito; Kurnia Wijaya; Rafadi Khan Khayru; Rio Saputra

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i3.866

Authors

Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
Sarwo Waskito Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
Kurnia Wijaya Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
Rafadi Khan Khayru Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
Rio Saputra Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.866

Keywords:

Wiretapping, Electronic Evidence, Corruption Crime, Procedural Law, Privacy Rights, Legal Dispute, Probative Value.

Abstract

This normative legal study examines the practice of wiretapping as evidence in proving corruption crimes in Indonesia, focusing on proof standards and privacy protection. The research aims to analyze the lawful procedural standards for wiretapping, the position and probative value of wiretapping results as electronic evidence in court, and potential legal disputes arising from its implementation. The study employs a qualitative literature review method, analyzing primary legal materials such as the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, the Criminal Procedure Code, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The findings indicate that wiretapping's legality is based on a complex regulatory interaction, requiring strict adherence to procedural standards including a clear legal basis, authority from competent institutions, supervision mechanisms, and proportionality principles. The position of wiretapping results as evidence is recognized under electronic evidence provisions, yet its probative strength is contingent upon factors of legality, integrity, relevance, and adherence to due process. Potential legal disputes encompass challenges to authority, procedural violations, constitutional rights infringements, and technical authenticity, each carrying significant implications for the admissibility of evidence. The study concludes that while wiretapping is a potent tool against corruption, its application must rigorously balance law enforcement objectives with fundamental rights protections within Indonesia's rule of law framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amir, I. (2022). Constitutionality of Wiretapping by KPK in Optimization of Red-Handed Catch Operations. Al Bayyinah. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v6i1.2625

Amsterdam, A. G., & Bruner, J. S. (2000). Minding the Law. Harvard University Press.

Arif, S. (2023). Institutional Design of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Post-Constitutional Court Decisions Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019 and Number 79/PUU-VII/2019. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v3i1.16947

Ashworth, A. (2002). Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure. Sweet & Maxwell.

Cahyono, D. A., & Lie, G. (2024). The Validity of Wiretapping as Evidence in Corruption Cases. International Journal of Science and Society. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1189

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Dalimunthe, A. P. (2024). Legality of the Practice of Wiretapping Methods Against Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Corruption in the Provisions of the Law on Criminal Acts of Corruption. Al-Qanun. https://doi.org/10.58836/al-qanun.v5i2.21762

Darmawan, D., & da Silva, B. D. S. (2025). Blockchain as an Instrument of Decentralized Social Order and Democratic Reconfiguration. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 11-18.

Darmawan, D., & Negara, D. S. (2023). The Application of Restorative Justice in Resolving Speech Cases in the Digital Space: A Normative Analysis of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Criminal Code. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 295-306.

Daun, Y. A., Chandra, T. Y., & Makbul, A. (2022). Kewenangan KPK Melakukan Penyadapan dalam Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Salam. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27637

Dworkin, R. (2006). Justice in Robes. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Fajar, I., Hardyansah, R., & Darmawan, D. (2024). Development of Cybercrime Law in Indonesia: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Science, Technology and Society (SICO), 5(1), 1–8.

Fajarudin, M., Negara, D. S., & Putra, A. R. (2024). Internal Audit Obligations and Corporate Legal Liability for Corruption. Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(1), 303-312.

Firdaus, M., Darmawan, D., & Saputra, R. (2022). Embezzlement in Corruption Crimes: A Case Study of Government Procurement of Goods and Services. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 33-37.

Franata, H. S., & Santiago, F. (2022). Authority of Taping as A Tool of Evidence in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia. Journal of World Science. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i11.135

Hadianto, Z., Riza, M., Moenta, A. P., & Azisa, N. (2024). Reconstruction and Formulation of Wiring Authority by the Prosecutor in Corruption Crimes. International Journal of Religion. https://doi.org/10.61707/kfyy2e57

Hardyansah, R., Farid, M., Atmari, A., & Zakki, M. (2022). Eradicate Village Fund Corruption: Efforts to Strengthen Law Enforcement. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 22-26.

Hasanah, H. (2023). The Legitimacy of Wiretapping Results from the Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi as Evidence in Corruption Cases Linked to Indonesian Legal Provisions. Proceeding of the International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.34010/icobest.v4i.350

Issalillah, F., & Hardyansah, R. (2024). Relevance of Privacy within the Sphere of Human Rights: A Critical Analysis of Personal Data Protection. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 3(1), 31-39.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Lubis, M. R. (2023). Penyadapan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v23i1.8097

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2010). Putusan Nomor 5/PUU-VIII/2010.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2016). Putusan Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2017). Putusan Nomor 42/PUU-XV/2017.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Muhammad, R., Adjid, S. A., & Amriyanto, A. (2025). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Konteks Penyadapan Menurut Peraturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legal Spirit. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v9i2.5853

Negara, D. S., Darmawan, D., & Saktiawan, P. (2022). Privacy Violations on Social Media and Interpersonal Trust Among Young Generations. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 151-156.

Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.

Nur, Z. (2025). Embedding Ethics and Justice in Digital Public Administration: Safeguarding Privacy, Legitimacy, and Public Trust. Journal of Science, Technology and Society (SICO), 6(2), 39–48.

Pakpahan, N. H. (2025). Formulation of Contempt of Court Statute to Restore Abused Judiciary’s Dignity Caused by Integrity Besmirch Through Retrial. Equality: Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2), 135-148.

Pakpahan, N. H., Prasetyo, T., Setyorini, E. H., & Mangesti, Y. A. (2022). Trial Proving in Electronic Criminal Case Trial Based on the Dignified Justice Perspective. Ius Poenale, 3(1), 1-12.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Posner, R. A. (2008). How Judges Think. Harvard University Press.

Pratika, D., Suwito, S., & Hardyansah, R. (2024). Tanggung Gugat Sengketa Hak Pertanahan Terhadap Pembeli yang Beritikad Baik. ManBiz: Journal of Management and Business, 3(3), 501-511.

Rachman, A. N., & Syarif, M. I. (2024). Problematika Izin Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Upaya Penyadapan Tersangka Korupsi. https://doi.org/10.15408/10mvcr48

Ramdhan, T. N., Sugiri, A., & Yuliati. (2022). Dinamika Regulasi Penyadapan dalam Undang-Undang dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Media Iuris. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v5i3.34204

Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 137. Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 58. Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 251. Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 183. Sekretariat Negara.

Reyhanif, A. A., & Nisrina, F. (2024). Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik dari Hasil Penyadapan dalam Proses Peradilan: ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Birokrasi. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i2.1232

Rizky, M. C., Darmawan, D., Suwito, S., Saputra, Pakpahan, N. H. (2023). Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi: Tantangan dan Langkah-Langkah Konkret. Jurnal Manuhara: Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis: Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia, 1(4), 407-419.

Saktiawan, P., Dirgantara, F., Darmawan, D., Isnaini, S., & Waluyo, A. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Investigation and Prosecution to Improve the Integrity of Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(01), 35-45.

Saktiawan, P., Pakpahan, N. H., Darmawan, D., Putra, A. R., & Almubarok, A. Z. R. (2025). Pembantuan dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Pasal 56 KUHP dan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(4), 8257-8269.

Saputra, R., Hardyansah, R., & Saktiawan, P. (2021). Preventing Corrupt Practices in Business and Investment throughEffective Law Enforcement. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 25-28.

Simester, A. P., & Sullivan, G. R. (2010). Criminal law: Theory and doctrine. Hart Publishing.

Sinambela, E. A., & Darmawan, D. (2022). Peran Integritas dan Kompetensi terhadap Kualitas Audit. Realible Accounting Journal, 1(2), 8-15.

Sinambela, E. A., & Mardikaningsih, R. (2021). Integritas Auditor dan Peranannya terhadap Pembentukan Komitmen Organisasi. Jurnal Simki Economic, 4(2), 112-120.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Suhartono, S., Sudjai, S., Darmawan, D., Rizky, M. C., & Saktiawan, P. (2024). The Effectiveness of Criminal Sanctions in Preventing Corruption: A Literature Review of the Indonesian Legal System. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 3(3), 43-48.

Sumilat, R. R. I., & Ginting, G. (2023). Legal Study of the Existence of Electronic Evidence in Corruption Crimes. Gema Wiralodra. https://doi.org/10.31943/gw.v14i2.494

Susanto, R., Sari, E., & M, M. (2023). Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/Puu-Xvii/2019). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh. https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v5i3.8655

Syakura, F. P. (2024). Utilisation of Voice Recordings as Electronic Evidence in Corruption Cases.Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum (Edisi Elektronik). https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5578

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Wahyudi, A., Saktiawan, P., Saputra, R., Waskito, S., & Wijaya, K. (2025). Integrated Legal Enforcement Challenges Regarding Cross-Border Digital Fraud and its Implications for Regulatory Reform. Journal of Science, Technology and Society (SICO), 6(1), 13–24.

Wigana, A. W., & Maryanto, M. (2020). The Strength of Proof of Telephone Tapping as Electronic Evidence in Revealing Corruption Cases. https://doi.org/10.30659/JDH.V3I1.8399

Zedner, L. (2004). Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.